
I had the odd luck to arrive in Oakland on October 19, 1991. I had   planned to stay for a week or so at the home of a close family friend.   She lived in the hills, in an almost painfully gorgeous house with a   view of the bay. Mainly I remember the view and the bookshelves in her   living room. The ceilings were high, and the shelves stretched from the   floor to the ceiling, covering one wall. In any case, the next morning   the fires came. I don’t want to dwell on the events of that day, except to state the obvious, that I survived. I made it out on foot with my two best friends   and our host. She and I went back a week or two later, as soon as the   city began allowing residents into the area that had burned. If I   remember right, she was hoping that one particularly treasured piece of   jewelry might have survived — we had fled in a hurry, empty-handed. But   nothing was left. All the trees were gone, and nearly all the houses.   What had been green and bright with flowers was gray and black for   miles, the enormity of the bay and the sky all the more blue for the   contrast. We found the wasted chassis of her car ten yards from the spot   where we had been forced to abandon it. I still have a teardrop-shaped   puddle of chrome that melted off the bumper. Except for the chimney,  the  house was entirely gone. No roof, no walls, not a rafter survived.  The  second floor had collapsed onto the first, ash intermingling with  ash.  Only the refrigerator, which stood at a funny angle but remained  more or  less intact, allowed us to figure out where the kitchen had  been. I  laughed — when I was a child, in the days before electronic  storage, my  mother used to stash her unpublished manuscripts in the  freezer. Even if  the house burned, she had reasoned, the books would  survive. I opened the  freezer door and, to my delight, found a few neat  bundles wrapped in  aluminum foil. I peeled back a corner. The  contents, whatever they had  once been, were reduced to pure black ash. A  few yards to the left, I  saw a miraculous sight. I’m getting to the  point here. In the mass of  otherwise indistinguishable cinders that had  once been that  high-ceilinged living room, I found the bookshelves. Or  at least the  books. They had tumbled from the shelves and lay on the  ground, yards of  them, their bindings closed, pages facing up. I  remember great, rolling  mounds of them, all the same color now, the  same whitish grey.  Everything else — big, stable, solid things:  staircases, couches, pots  and pans — had been incinerated and  disappeared, but the individual  pages of individual books had retained  their contours. As I stood there,  marveling, I couldn’t help myself. I  reached down to touch them, to  feel the ridges of the pages against the  pads of my fingers. They  collapsed at my touch. They didn’t crumble.  There wasn’t enough to them  to crumble. They collapsed into the most  perfect powdery ash. You’ll  laugh at me, but I mean it when I say that  the surprise I felt — my  breath still catches—the impossible fineness  of that ash, the keen sense  of the irrecoverable, made that one of the  most beautiful moments of my  life. Maybe sublime would be a better  word. In any case, I tell this  story with a banal and semi-petty  motivation. Which is that I finally  figured out exactly what it is that  I dislike about Jonathan Franzen.  Not personally — I hear he’s a  decent fellow. It’s what he says and  writes, and what he says about  what he writes, and the implications of  what he says and writes and  says about what he writes, that bothers me.  Maybe you’ve already read this. Poor thing, he seems so fragile. He seems to really believe that literature is “permanent and unalterable.” Don’t tell him!